Artificial intelligence laws
Navigating the Evolving Landscape of AI Laws: Compliance
Law |
Utah AI Policy Act |
NYC Local Law 144 |
Maryland HB 1202: Facial Recognition Law |
Effective Date |
1-May-24 | 5-Jul-23 | 1-Oct-20 |
Scope |
Companies deploying GenAI tools, classified as either "regulated occupations" or those outside of regulated businesses. | Employers and employment agencies using AEDTs to evaluate candidates for employment or employees for promotion that reside in New York City. | Employers who use facial recognition during hiring. |
Opt-out Options |
The law does not currently provide a direct "Opt-out" option for users to completely avoid AI interactions, but the disclosure requirement allows users to make informed decisions based on their awareness of interacting with an AI. | All applicants to a New York City job posting have the opportunity during the job application to opt out of the use of AEDTs. | All applicants to a New York City job posting may opt-out/not provide consent to use certain facial recognition technologies during an interview. |
Accommodations |
Disclosure requirement allows users to make informed decisions based on their awareness of interacting with an AI. | Companies must provide affected individuals with disabilities under ADA protections a way to request accommodation or alternative selection process upon request. Non-ADA based requests for an alternative selection process are not required to be granted by Companies in this Law. | Applicants who refuse to sign a waiver consenting to use of facial recognition technologies are to be interviewed without those technologies. |
Private Right of Action |
No |
Yes | Not specified |
Penalties |
Violators could face an administrative fine of up to 2,500 USD and a civil penalty up to 5,000 USD. |
Penalties for non-compliance are a $500 fine for the first violation and $1,500 fines for subsequent violations. | No specific fines or penalties are mentioned. |
Law |
Portland's Facial Recognition Ban |
Illinois AI Video Interview Act (AIVIA) |
Illinois HB 3773: AI Anti-Discrimination Amendment to Human Rights Act |
Effective Date |
1-Jan-21 | 1-Jan-20 | 1-Jan-26 |
Scope |
Private entities in places of public accommodations | Employers who use AI to analyze video interviews of job applicants for positions based in Illinois. | Employers that use AI for employment decisions for anybody based in the state of Illinois. |
Opt-out Options |
None, it is a ban. | Allows applicants of a job to opt-out of video interviews. | No opt-out option required from employers. |
Accommodations |
None. | While applicants may opt-out, a replacement format for alternative interviewing isn't specified in under the law, leaving room for employers to write off such individuals. Individuals may ask for their recordings to be destroyed. | None Specified. |
Private Right of Action |
Yes |
Not specified. | Yes |
Penalties |
Individuals can sue a private entity in any court of competent jurisdiction for damages sustained as a result of the violation or $1,000 per day for each day of the violation, whichever is greater and such other remedies may be appropriate. |
The Act does not specify what types of remedies are available, nor quantify available damages. | No specific fines or penalties are mentioned. Failure to meet the requirements of this bill is considered a civil rights violations. |
Law |
California SB 942: California's AI Transparency Act |
Colorado's SB 24-205: AI Act |
Effective Date |
1-Jan-26 | 1-Feb-26 |
Scope |
"Covered providers," meaning a person that creates, codes, or produces a GenAI system that has over one million monthly visitors and is publicly accessible within CA. Also, applies to third party deployers in that they must abide by downstream contractual obligations. | Developers and deployers of high-risk AI systems used by consumers or workers in Colorado. |
Opt-out Options |
Covered providers will not collect or retain personal information of users that submit feedback on the AI system unless the user opts in to being contacted by the provider for feedback purposes. | Consumers are to be informed of their right to opt out of having their personal data processed by AI systems that make consequential decisions or from being profiled by these systems. |
Accommodations |
None specified. | None Specified. |
Private Right of Action |
No |
No |
Penalties |
If a covered provider revokes the license it granted to a third party licensee for failure to maintain latent disclosures and the licensee continues to use the AI system, the licensee may be responsible not just for breach but subject directly to civil actions brought by government prosecutors. For covered providers, $5,000 per violation, with each day in violation deemed a separate violation. |
Violations of the Act are deemed to be unfair trade practice under the Colorado Consumer Protection Act, with penalties up to $20,000 per violation. |
Law |
Bill 64: Quebec Privacy Law |
Bill 149 : Ontario Working for Workers Four Act (AI disclosures in job postings requirement specifically) |
Effective Date |
Spread out from 22-Sep-22 to 22-Sep-24 | 1-Jan-26 |
Scope |
Businesses headquartered in Quebec (protects their consumers and workers) as well as businesses whose website has visitors from Quebec. | Companies with 25 or more workers |
Opt-out Options |
Individuals can opt-out of being profiled by businesses that use algorithms or other technology. | No opt-out option required form employers. |
Accommodations |
|
None Specified. |
Private Right of Action |
Yes |
The Act does not explicitly establish a private right of action. However, individuals can seek judicial redress if the government does not investigate a complaint. |
Penalties |
|
The maximum fine for individuals who violate the Employment Standards Act (ESA) or who fail to comply with a related order or direction is $100,000. |
Law |
EU AI Act |
Effective Date |
1-Aug-24 |
Scope |
Providers and deployers of AI systems used within the European Union, even if they are developed outside of the European Union. |
Opt-out Options |
No opt-out option for deployers and users. |
Accommodations |
None Specified. |
Private Right of Action |
No |
Penalties |
|
TCWGlobal simplifies complex employment law issues, offering expert guidance on everything from mandatory leave laws to employment discrimination claims. Their legal team partners with your business to ensure compliance and appropriate treatment of workers globally.